[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: big deal
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: big deal
- From: Tom Williams <twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:10:21 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
We have it in our Science Direct and other agreements that we can cancel all or some titles if budget problems mandate it. Also, we can eliminate up to 1% of our total amount spent each year. Not much and for us comes to about 1 title per year. Still it's something. How restrictive or not your license is can depend very much on how well you can negotiate and how much clout your institution or consortia has. Another reason why my mantra continues to be "develop national guidelines for licensing." MLA, SLA, ALA, et al, where are you? Thomas L. Williams, M.S.L.S, A.H.I.P, Director C.M. Baugh Biomedical Library and Media Production Services. University of South Alabama, BLB 326, Mobile, Al 36688 tel. (251)460-6885 fax. (251)460-7638 twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu > Hi All: > > I'm doing some reporting on the so-called Big Deal -- contracts where the > library agrees to subscribe to all of a publishers' e-journals, but can > not cancel individual electronic journals without losing a subscription to > all the journals. > > I'm interested in speaking to librarians who have either rejected the big > deal for their academic library, or are strongly supportive of it. > > Please contact me via e-mail or phone. > > Thanks, > > Andrea Foster > Assistant Editor > Chronicle of Higher Education > 202-466-1740 > andrea.foster@chronicle.com
- Prev by Date: Reminder about migrating from IDEAL to ScienceDirect
- Next by Date: Copyright of previous public domain
- Prev by thread: RE: big deal
- Next by thread: Re: big deal
- Index(es):