[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Journal archives and Finally hitting the core question
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Journal archives and Finally hitting the core question
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@princeton.edu>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 17:00:46 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
1. UNFAIR USE In print it was harder, but people did it anyway. And not just students for their own personal use, but commercial as well. And not just commercial, but officially or quasi-officially by some nations that did not then recognize copyright. Not just the copying but the distribution seems to me inordinately expensive for the benefits, but apparently those involved thought it worthwhile. And not just journals. Around 1960, some of my friends used to buy otherwise expensive math books, copied and printed in slightly reduced format on thin paper, produced in some Asian country and shipped in through a 3rd country. One had to pay in advance, with a money order made out to another individual, even though only 1 in 2 shipments came through, and the books were sometimes warped from sea-water damage. 2. FAIR USE But, Rick to follow up your other message on: Finally hitting the core question >Then where is the coherent argument for allowing people to >circumvent those restrictions? The restrictions affect fair use also. They also affect even paid use. Remember that when one has paid for access, one is entitled to get it. To say that having paid for access, if it doesn't work, you cannot hack it to get it to work, is not coherent. Examples: contracts not prohibiting off-campus use via a proxy server, or use on a Unix machine, but where the publisher's technology deliberately or accidentally prevents it. Copyright is acceptable because it is balanced by a/the desirability of encouraging authorship b/lasts for a limited time and c/permits fair use. The first two are in the Constitution, the third only in the statute. The third is necessary because the ability to exchange portions of the material is much of the value. I, personally, do not generally buy electronic resources whose data cannot be printed, emailed, and stored, because my patrons wouldn't be able to make their necessary use of it. > ------------- > Rick Anderson > rickand@unr.edu -- David Goodman Research Librarian and Biological Science Bibliographer Princeton University Library Princeton, NJ 08544-0001 phone: 609-258-7785 fax: 609-258-2627 e-mail: dgoodman@princeton.edu
- Prev by Date: digital reference
- Next by Date: Piracy of books and journals
- Prev by thread: re: Negotiating with the Library of Congress
- Next by thread: RE: Journal archives and Finally hitting the core question
- Index(es):