[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Napster, Planned Obsolescence & Control
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Napster, Planned Obsolescence & Control
- From: Rick Anderson <Rick_Anderson@uncg.edu>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 00:29:56 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Simone says: > It is not a matter of being pro- or anti-property rights. I > think that every librarian agrees that professional authors > have to receive fair compensation for their work and that > every intellectual work needs protection against > plagiarism, theft, etc... Rick says: Man, I sure wish that were true. The problem is that too many librarians are deeply invested in the illusion that what we provide is a free service -- which leads, naturally, to the fantasy that there is such a thing as free information. Our infatuation with that illusion leads many (though not most) of us to regard with deep suspicion any claim of ownership over information. The general public, most of whom, in my experience, have never labored under the misapprehension that libraries provide free service, seem now to be starting to share this illusion, thanks to the apparent (but also illusory) "freeness" of the Internet. If the general public decides that information "wants to be free" and that all attempts to control information are repressive and untenable, the proximate losers will be libraries and the ultimate losers will be the general public. -------- Rick Anderson Head Acquisitions Librarian Jackson Library UNC Greensboro (336) 334-5281 rick_anderson@uncg.edu "If you enjoy, you understand; if you understand, you enjoy... To like a football game is to understand it in the football way." -- Gertrude Stein
- Prev by Date: Re: Napster, Planned Obsolescence & Control
- Next by Date: Digital Copying of Musical Works
- Prev by thread: Re: Napster, Planned Obsolescence & Control
- Next by thread: Re: unacceptable license terms
- Index(es):