[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unacceptable license terms
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: unacceptable license terms
- From: Don Wassink <lbdonw@ust.hk>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 23:39:40 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Michael Rancer wrote: > I've been through about 100 licenses in the last 4 years. No matter what > else I look out for, there are 3 items I will not accept under any > circumstances: > > 1. An indemnity clause, other than standard University of California > approved language. > > <text deleted> We also struggle with these indecipherable indemnity clauses. One vendor, who could not explain to us what the clause meant, still insisted on keeping it in. But they were willing to accept a second clause that we then insisted on, to counteract it and protect the library. "Dueling clauses" you might say. That being the case, could you share with the list what is the "standard University of California approved language"? Don Wassink Associate University Librarian Hong Kong University of Science & Technology
- Prev by Date: Re unacceptable license terms
- Next by Date: Re: Re unacceptable license terms
- Prev by thread: Re: Napster, Planned Obsolescence & Control
- Next by thread: Re: Unacceptable license terms
- Index(es):