[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re unacceptable license terms
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Re unacceptable license terms
- From: Victoria.Mitchell@directory.reed.edu (Victoria Mitchell)
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 23:55:39 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I am wondering if UC (see Michael Rancer's post below) or anyone else has managed to negotiate a license agreement with the Canadian Mathematical Society. Their license contains a broad indemnity clause and jurisdiction in the Province of Ottawa, Canada. While the people there are very nice and tried to be responsive to my requests, they have refused to amend either one of those clauses, and informed me that the agreement has been signed by other libraries in the U.S. and elsewhere. Has anyone else been more successful with the CMS than I, or have any of you just signed their agreement as is? Victoria Mitchell Reed College Library --- Michael Rancer wrote: I've been through about 100 licenses in the last 4 years. No matter what else I look out for, there are 3 items I will not accept under any circumstances: 1. An indemnity clause, other than standard University of California approved language. 2. Responsibility for the actions of anyone other than a UC Berkeley Library employee. 3. Jurisdiction outside the state of California. These are non-negotiable and show-stoppers. In these 4 years, I've only had one vendor refuse to sign an amended license, and that was a university press insisting on an indemnification clause. We are the buyers, have a right to protect ourselves and should not forget this aspect of the relationship. --- end of quote ---
- Prev by Date: Re: unacceptable license terms
- Next by Date: Re: Unacceptable license terms
- Prev by thread: Re unacceptable license terms
- Index(es):