[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Sage titles (access and licenses)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Sage titles (access and licenses)
- From: dgoodman@Princeton.EDU (David Goodman (dgoodman@Princeton.EDU))
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:59:37 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Course packs. This is not really a problem, because all that is necessary to do is to give the students the url, and they themselves, being included in the institution's ip based access, can use the journal. (Use off campus has the usual problems of requiring a proxy server or a password). As far as I know this makes all wording about course packs in licenses irrelevant. In fact this is much more flexible than conventional electronic reserves, which limits access to the students actually enrolled in the course (and with the licensing fees paid on that basis). With any e-journal, everyone gets access, and to the whole journal, not just a selected article. As far as requiring oclc or ebsco, we too have had great difficulty setting up titles that require it. I very strongly urge all publishers who want to actualy sell access to as many libraries as possible to avoid this. David Goodman
- Prev by Date: Carol's mortification (Re: RE: Sage titles)
- Next by Date: Bundling E & P? (was Sage titles)
- Prev by thread: Re: Bundling E & P? (was Sage titles)
- Next by thread: RE: Sage titles (access and licenses)
- Index(es):