[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Library logos for web resources
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Library logos for web resources
- From: "Peter McDonald" <pmcdonal@library.syr.edu>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:51:02 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
As our focus on collections increasingly becomes one of licensing agreements and electronic resources, and as a growing share of our allocations are spent on same, is there any gathering momentum out there to press e-resource vendors and publishers to provide us in turn (e.g. individual licensee libraries) with "real estate" on their product web-pages (at the title level) to display our individual library logos? Consider that I had a work study student in my office yesterday who thought some of our FirstSearch databases were "free"! Why? Because there was nothing on the databases to indicate that they were being brought to his desktop BY THE LIBRARY and since he didn't have to pay for access it was perfectly logical from a student's point of view to consider them part of the vast "free" Internet. Why would he think otherwise? When I told him that these "freebies" cost upwards of tens of thousands of dollars his eyes literally popped out. The ALCTS-CMDS-ColDev & Electronic Media Committee is looking into writing some sort of boilerplate on these "Electronic License Stamps" -- little more than inline gifs really. The committee's hope is that eventually all e-publishers will provide us with the ability to display our library logos at the title level as part of every e- contract. netLibrary is out in front on this and if you visit the UT Austin site, "UT logo" appears on every "e-book" TP along with the netLibrary logo (at least that was so last I saw) -- but who else is doing this? Anyone? But to spend millions on resources and then have so few of our users grasp that they are "in" the library and we're paying for these very expensive resources seems foolhardy. To those who attended the Academic Press luncheon at midwinter, when I brought the topic up there, AP couldn't have been more open and positive about it. Ditto though to a lesser extent Chadwyck-Healey. J. Curtis at Springer seemed amenable as did Adam Chandler at Kluwer. In short, I've run into no big resistance -- but is the fight worth it? Has anyone out there had any experience? Thoughts? Peter McDonald Collection Development Syracuse University Library Tel# 315-443-2977
- Prev by Date: archiving thoughts
- Next by Date: Re: Elsevier Web Editions license
- Prev by thread: Re: Elsevier Web Editions license
- Next by thread: RE: Library logos for web resources
- Index(es):