[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Library consortia and e-resource vendors/publishers
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Library consortia and e-resource vendors/publishers
- From: Wayne Smith <wsmith@greenwood.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:17:16 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I certainly welcome Bernie Sloan's recent email concerning library consortia and e-resource vendors. I hope it gives rise to an informative discussion. I've polled some of my staff and have identified a couple of questions, reflecting the publisher perspective. First question simply has to do with whether and to what extent there is a preferred approach publishers should adopt when it comes to contacting consortia in connection with licensing electronic resources. I suspect this goes to the heart of Bernie's comment that "consortia can be difficult to understand if you have no direct experience..." With new e-resource vendors emerging on a regular basis, the potential for confusion is present. By the same token, it would seem that all parties would have a vested interest in assuring that the information flow regarding products, prices, licensing terms and other issues of interest to consortia is delivered in a manner that is useful and timely. Thus, from the e-resource vendor/publisher point of view, I would think that any "do's and don'ts" in this regard would be useful to hear. Also of interest, would be any comments relating to libraries that have overlapping memberships in multiple consortia - and thus variable sales terms. Finally, how do consortia deal with member libraries who may have bought a particular product, prior to negotiating terms or perhaps more favorable terms for a particular product at the consortia level? Wayne Smith Greenwood Publishing Group On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Sloan, Bernie wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:38:38 EST > From: "Sloan, Bernie" <bernies@uillinois.edu> > Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> > Subject: Library consortia and e-resource vendors/publishers > > > I've been involved with library consortia for about 25 years. For the past > 10 years I've been involved with selecting and purchasing electronic > resources for library consortia. > > >From my experience, e-resource vendors and publishers understand consortia > better than they did ten years ago. But I have the impression that there is > still a fair amount that vendors and publishers don't understand about > consortia. I don't necessarily mean that as a negative comment about > vendors/publishers. Consortia can be difficult to understand if you have no > direct experience in that area. > > I'm doing some research into the relationships between consortia and > vendors/publishers, and I'd like to get some input from practitioners: > > 1. If you're affiliated with an e-resource vendor or publisher, are there > things you'd like to understand better about consortia? > > 2. If you're affiliated with a library consortium, are there things that you > wish publishers/vendors understood better about consortia? > > Thanks! > > Bernie Sloan > Senior Library Information Systems Consultant > University of Illinois Office for Planning and Budgeting > 338 Henry Administration Building > 506 S. Wright Street > Urbana, IL 61801 > Phone: (217) 333-4895 > Fax: (217) 333-6355 > E-mail: bernies@uillinois.edu > >
- Prev by Date: Re: Library consortia and e-resource vendors/publishers
- Next by Date: UK Serials Group Conference 2000 and Exhibition
- Prev by thread: Re: Library consortia and e-resource vendors/publishers
- Next by thread: Library consortia and e-resource vendors/publishers
- Index(es):