Re: ILL Language

["Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <chief-exec@alpsp.org>]

I don't know where the original wording came from, but it may be a
reflection of the recent change in UK copyright law?

Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
E-mail:  chief-exec@alpsp.org
ALPSP Website  http://www.alpsp.org

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Croft, Janet B." <jbcroft@ou.edu>
To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: RE: ILL Language

> Yes -- it might be reasonable to agree to a clause saying you will only
> lend from this database to a library connected to a not-for-profit
> institution, thus reducing the possibility that the item will be retained
> by the receiving library for commercial purposes.
>
> Janet Brennan Croft
> Head of Access Services
> University of Oklahoma
>
>
> From: "Lesley Ellen Harris" <lesley@copyrightlaws.com>
> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
> Subject: Re: ILL language - responsibility of library
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:28:46 EST
>
> Another issue to think about re this ILL language is how responsible is
> the library for ensuring that the use is for noncommercial purposes.
> Generally, a library does not want to have this burden/responsibility
> and wording could be chosen to ensure this.
>
> Lesley Ellen Harris
> Copyright Lawyer/Consultant
> lesley@copyrightlaws.com