[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
If electronic is to replace paper
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: If electronic is to replace paper
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@princeton.edu>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 22:53:44 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
If electronic is to replace paper we need acceptable pricing and standards. To quote David Sommers, I think the basic financial pricing model most librarians would like to see are: > 1. separate pricing by individual title and format. > 2. sufficient differential between electronic and print > pricing to offer clear incentives to transfer format, even allowing for > VAT factor (where applicable). > 3. if we absolutely must have packages of titles, they > should be bundled by subject - not publisher - and should permit > cancellations of hard-copy. (I applaud the idea of packages by discipline, which I have not yet seen offered!) Besides appropriate pricing that encourages the switch, if electronic is to replace paper, the necessary conditions (besides the basic standard terms) are: A. Redundant adequate servers, with guaranteed up-time (99.5% ? -- that's 1 hr a week) and response time (Clicking on journal name to displaying article titles in the current issue: 10 sec., article to pdf page view: 10 sec?. Obviously, local conditions must be optimal for this, but I was just able to reproducibly achieve both times for at least two different publishers.) B. Guaranteed access to the years purchased if the subscription is subsequently canceled. C. Permanent archiving, forever, by the publisher or acceptable third party, with backup provisions to deal with the inability of the archiving organization to continue. In particular, if permanent archiving is guaranteed by the publisher, there must be a designated acceptable organization to which the rights will be transferred if the publisher cannot continue. D. Ability to use for interlibrary loan, paper, fax, or electronic, subject to the current provisions of copyright law for paper copies, including the COG limitations and CCC payments. It is appropriate to require that a permanent copy not be stored, paper or electronic. (It would also be acceptable to require electronic transmittal to be made via a non-digital intermediate medium, e.g. printing a copy and scanning it. ) E. Access to any authorized library user in the libraries, without password or required identification. F. Access to the entire organization's own user community anywhere on campus without personal identification or password, and by proxy server or password from anywhere in the world AND, most importantly: G. The electronic version must contain at least the full complete cover to cover equivalent of the printed journal in page image format via pdf or equivalent. Note that links, searching, and enriched content when appropriate are now standard features; all e-journals are expected to have them. A few publishers do already offer most or all of the above. I do not think any library which intends a permanent collection can possible replace print without all of them. To the extent that ejournals are supplementary to print, naturally many of these conditions can be less rigid. But without every one of them, e-journals are in important ways less good than paper. -- David Goodman Biology Librarian, and Co-Chair, Electronic Journals Task Force Princeton University Library dgoodman@princeton.edu http://www.princeton.edu/~biolib/ phone: 609-258-3235 fax: 609-258-2627
- Prev by Date: Re: Preferred pricing model for journals
- Next by Date: RE: If electronic is to replace paper
- Prev by thread: Publisher Joint Linking Effort Announced
- Next by thread: RE: If electronic is to replace paper
- Index(es):