[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Elsevier's Approach to Pricing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Elsevier's Approach to Pricing
- From: Steven Melamut <melamut@email.unc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:24:44 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Out of curiosity, does Elsevier permit off campus access using these new contracts? Even if it doesn't permit it, does your contract prohibit the use of a proxy server? steve -- *********************************************************** Steven Melamut Kathrine R. Everett Law Library University of North Carolina CB #3385 Ridge Road Chapel Hill, NC 27599 melamut@email.unc.edu work: 919-843-7898 fax: 919-843-7810 "It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory." W. Edwards Denning *********************************************************** _____________________ Katherine Porter wrote: > I find myself forced to respond to this posting. From our experience with > PEAK and now ScienceDirect I definitely agree our patrons are using a > wider range of titles than in the days of only print. This is all to the > good as we couldn't possibly subscribe to every journal our patrons might > need. > > Why then did we just get hit with a policy which makes this new wide > access a travesty? One of the problems withPEAK as well as the electronic > collections of some other publishers was the requirement for individual > registration. From my experience in two different libraries, I can vouch > for the fact that every roadblock thrown up means a group of users who > turn away. It seems like Elsevier was making their ScienceDirect access as > easy as possible for users. Well yesterday we found out that each and > every Vanderbilt user must set up individual registration to be able to > use SD titles for which we have no print subscription. BOY IS THIS A STEP > BACKWARDS. It could very well be that the positive feedback I have been > hearing from faculty here will hit a sudden brick wall when they next try > to access that journal title that was becoming a new favorite. > > Kitty Porter > Stevenson Science & Engineering Library > 419 21st Avenue South > Vanderbilt University > Nashville TN 37240 > Phone: 615-343-7106 > Fax: 615-343-7249 > Email: porter@library.vanderbilt.edu > > __________________ > > > As many of you know, many positive changes have been made to Elsevier > > Science policies (including pricing policies) in the last few months. In > > addition, the positive feedback we have received from our ScienceDirect > > customers has been very promising in terms of validating our goal to > > enhance the dissemination of scientific information. > > > > In view of our increased efforts to focus on our customers' needs, we are > > troubled by the recent comments made in the liblicense-l forum. Several > > of the comments lead us to believe that there is a basic misunderstanding > > of our policies. Simply put, the perception voiced by a few individuals > > is not the reality. > > > > Though it is extremely difficult to address these concerns in this type of > > forum, we would like to set the record straight on a few items. > > > > 1. Elsevier Science recognizes that each institution is unique. > > > > 2. Pricing alternatives do exist for the delivery of electronic content > > through the SD platform. These alternatives are based on such > > considerations as each institution's service level goals, user needs > > (including programs of study), and funding for electronic resources. > > > > 3. With the goal of helping institutions find a solution to the problem of > > limited (rationed) availability of scientific information, we provide for > > the possibility (not the force feeding) of access to our entire database > > of over 1,100 journals, if that option is desired by a customer. > > > > 4. Combined print and electronic information delivery is available for > > only a small increase in cost over the price of print and is based on the > > customer's existing print collection. Electronic-only subscriptions are > > available for less than the cost of the print subscription. > > > > 5. ScienceDirect customers with access to the entire Elsevier Science > > journal collection report that the usage of titles previously unsubscribed > > to account for a surprisingly large proportion of the total usage of > > Elsevier material. This indicates quite clearly that the availability of > > additional material is a significant value to our customers. Contrary to > > comments made in this forum, there is no requirement that a customer > > accept this particular option. > > > > 6. Elsevier Science is actively pursuing the enhancement of our electronic > > products and platforms and expects that in the future there will be > > targeted products available to meet the specific needs of different types > > of libraries and user communities. > > > > At this time it is important that we learn from the feedback of librarians > > and researchers who, based on their experiences with ScienceDirect, are > > beginning to identify a new set of requirements for the second generation > > of electronic services. As a result, we expect new products and > > accompanying new pricing options to emerge. The business model of today > > must be viewed as transitional in nature. > > > > Neil Posner > > Vice President - Pricing > > Elsevier Science > > n.posner@elsevier.com <mailto:k.hunter@elsevier.com>
- Prev by Date: Re: Elsevier's Approach to Pricing
- Next by Date: Re: Elsevier's Approach to Pricing
- Prev by thread: Re: Elsevier's Approach to Pricing
- Next by thread: Re: Elsevier's Approach to Pricing
- Index(es):