[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
pricing questions: perspective from a publisher
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: pricing questions: perspective from a publisher
- From: "Mulak, Tom" <TMulak@liebertpub.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:28:25 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Since I joined this very lively list server, I have shared some of the thought-provoking messages with my boss, the CEO of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. publishers. Mary Ann has asked me to send this message to the list. Tom Mulak, VP, Electronic Journals Program, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. I don't know how many subscriptions there are to Brain Research, but I can tell you that every publisher would be thrilled to have a journal like that. Libraries will continue to take it regardless of any price hike, which is absolutely astounding to me. Its publisher knows very well that they can do whatever they please in terms of pricing because although they may lose some subscriptions, the journal's price increase will ensure more profits.. Pricing journals is a difficult issue and I'd love your input. For instance, some publishers, in pricing their on-line journals, are making the policy that the library must take all of them. Personally, I would think that librarians would prefer to select them, journal by journal. However, if libraries seem to capitulate to "you must take all", then it sends us a strong message that we should follow suit. What do you think? Recently, by the way, I was perusing Marcel Dekker's website and I was astonished at the library subscription rates. Obviously libraries must be paying these prices, even though they are staggering. Societies have this tremendous advantage of a not-for-profit tax status which provides significant savings. They then use their money for all sorts of other perks like magnificent headquarters (you probably know about the New England Journal of Medicine move and the recent resignation of their editor in chief). Because of all of their tax advantages and the strong subsidy that comes from membership dues, societies can price journals attractively. Highly specialized journals often make an important contribution to the field as well as the literature, but because they have a small but critical readership, they do tend to be more expensive. Still I believe publishers have responsibility to price them so that they recover costs, make some profit, but do not gouge the librarian. I hope we are doing just that. Look forward to your comments. Mary Ann Liebert, president, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. (www.liebertpub.com)
- Prev by Date: Re: Article based subscription
- Next by Date: RE: pricing questions: perspective from a publisher
- Prev by thread: PubMed Central Update.
- Next by thread: RE: pricing questions: perspective from a publisher
- Index(es):