[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Cox Associates Release of Model Licenses
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Cox Associates Release of Model Licenses
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 11:48:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
John Cox, of John Cox Associates (John.E.Cox@btinternet.com) sends the following important announcement: ___________________________________________________________________________ Licensingmodels.com: model standard licenses for academic, public and corporate libraries John Cox, John Cox Associates, John.E.Cox@btinternet.com A suite of generic standard licenses for electronic journals is now available on a new web site: www.licensingmodels.com What makes these model licenses different is that they have been sponsored by and developed in close cooperation with five major subscription agents: Blackwell, Dawson, EBSCO, Harrassowitz and Swets. Each of these companies has traditionally sought to rationalize and ease the process of ordering journals. They provide bibliographic and management services to libraries, and an effective distribution channel for 20,000 publishers world-wide who publish for the library market. The negotiation and management of licenses for electronic information is a natural expansion of this long-established activity. There are four model licenses, for single academic institutions, for academic consortia, for public libraries, and for corporate, government and other research libraries. They are international in application and are the result of consultation in which librarians, publishers and subscription agents have been actively involved. Their development has been undertaken by John Cox Associates, an international publishing consultancy specializing in licensing and content management. The process of developing licenses is evolutionary. The starting point was the UK's PA/JISC model license, the first to be developed jointly by publishers and librarians, from the Publishers Association and the Joint Information Systems Committee of the Higher Education Funding Councils. It was a vital source of format, concepts and model provisions. The US Principles for Licensing Electronic Resources from the American Library Association et al, and the Statements of Current Perspectives from the International Coalition of Library Consortia were both important sources of ideas, as were the LIBLICENSE web site and many publishers' individual licenses already in the public arena. These licenses are in the public domain. They are intended to help publishers, subscription agents and libraries to create agreements that express what they have negotiated. They do not prescribe the outcome of those negotiations, but are designed to account for the varying needs of different types of customer, and the requirements and policies of different publishers. They contain a range of variables, so that the clause appropriate to each situation can be selected in compiling the license. They are clearly written, flexible and succinct. John Cox John Cox Associates The Pippins, 6 Lees Close, Whittlebury TOWCESTER Northants NN12 8XF United Kingdom Tel: +44 1327 857908
- Prev by Date: Citation indexing and Re: Ejournal use data, was: Elsevier andcancellations
- Next by Date: Re: Response to lib-license email
- Prev by thread: Re: Citation indexing and Re: Ejournal use data, was: Elsevier and cancellations
- Next by thread: Citation indexing and Re: Ejournal use data, was: Elsevier andcancellations
- Index(es):