[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Citation indexing and Re: Ejournal use data, was: Elsevier andcancellations
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Citation indexing and Re: Ejournal use data, was: Elsevier andcancellations
- From: Hunger99@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 23:30:06 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Didn't Garfield pioneer this area by looking at citation indexing? Doesn't Science Citation Indexing still put out numbers on what journals and what articles have the most impact in a field? Are these not better, more direct, measures than how often a journal is accessed? It would appear that accessing may be related to the impact of a journal or article, but what we would like to know for understanding progress and development in a field is impact, or some such measure. Aren't citation measures available to librarians for free from SCI? And SSCi? dh
- Prev by Date: Re: Ejournal use data, was: Elsevier and cancellations
- Next by Date: Cox Associates Release of Model Licenses
- Prev by thread: Cox Associates Release of Model Licenses
- Next by thread: Re: Citation indexing and Re: Ejournal use data, was: Elsevier andcancellations
- Index(es):