[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- From: "Gary S. Lawrence" <Gary.Lawrence@ucop.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:45:54 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Victoria -- according to the University of California's Office of General Counsel, the term "best efforts," as you might guess, implies a standard of diligence and care that goes beyond those you normally employ. The advice of counsel is that, unless we really intend to give special treatment to a particular publisher/vendor with respect to the provision(s) calling for "best efforts," we should resist the use of this term. We have found our licensors to be pliable on this issue, although we have on occasion had to explain the reasons: a) that we will apply the standard of care that we employ with all licensed content with regard to [access][security][copyright compliance][whatever...], but see no compelling reason to give this licensor special treatment; and b) we are acting on advice of counsel. *************************************************** * Gary S. Lawrence, DLIS * Director, Library Planning and Policy Development * California Digital Library * University of California * 1111 Franklin Street, 11th Floor * Oakland, CA 94607-5200 * Voice: (510) 987-9461 * Fax: (510) 587-6401 * Internet: gary.lawrence@ucop.edu *************************************************** ___________ At 07:36 PM 7/8/1999 EDT, you wrote: >Does anyone know what, if any, is the legal difference between "reasonable >efforts" and "best efforts"? This is in regard to the wording of a >license where it sets forth what is required of the licensee in >maintaining security, preventing unauthorized use, enforcing use >restrictions, etc. > >Both terms would seem to be fairly loose and open to legal interpretation, >but I suspect that "best" may hold one to a higher standard of performance >than "reasonable". I generally use "reasonable efforts" when revising >license agreements, but have encountered a case where the licensor's >attorney has countered my revision with a revision that substitutes "best >efforts" where I had proposed "reasonable efforts". Is this worth >worrying about? (Another part of the license combines both into the >phrase "reasonable best efforts".) > >Thanks in advance for any advice, > >Victoria Mitchell >Reed College Library >Portland, OR 97202 >mitchell@reed.edu >503/777-7272 (ph) >503/777-7786 (fax)
- Prev by Date: Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- Next by Date: New UK initiative for publisher/librarian co-operation
- Prev by thread: Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- Next by thread: Wiley licensing changes
- Index(es):