[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- From: Tony Ferguson <ferguson@columbia.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:42:46 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Our lawyer's read is that best would require more effort than reasonable and would be more open to interpretation. Tony Ferguson ___________ Victoria Mitchell wrote: > Does anyone know what, if any, is the legal difference between "reasonable > efforts" and "best efforts"? This is in regard to the wording of a > license where it sets forth what is required of the licensee in > maintaining security, preventing unauthorized use, enforcing use > restrictions, etc. > > Both terms would seem to be fairly loose and open to legal interpretation, > but I suspect that "best" may hold one to a higher standard of performance > than "reasonable". I generally use "reasonable efforts" when revising > license agreements, but have encountered a case where the licensor's > attorney has countered my revision with a revision that substitutes "best > efforts" where I had proposed "reasonable efforts". Is this worth > worrying about? (Another part of the license combines both into the > phrase "reasonable best efforts".) > > Thanks in advance for any advice, > > Victoria Mitchell > Reed College Library > Portland, OR 97202 > mitchell@reed.edu > 503/777-7272 (ph) > 503/777-7786 (fax)
- Prev by Date: Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- Next by Date: Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- Prev by thread: Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- Next by thread: Re: "Best" vs. "Reasonable" Efforts
- Index(es):