[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sig
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, Rick Anderson <rick_anderson@uncg.edu>
- Subject: Re[2]: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sig
- From: mspinell@aaas.org (MSPINELL)
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:06:44 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Rick, Surely you're right that one party cannot just unilaterally issue new terms. Otherwise, there'd be no point in striking agreements, would there? However, I suppose an analogy is possible to what credit card companies do. Periodically, they'll issue a new set of rules or terms. As a credit card holder, I can choose to accept the new terms or reject them by terminating the agreement. That feels pretty unilateral to me, though I suppose technically, legally, it's not, since the card holder can't be bound by the new rules against his/her will. Science Online has, over the last year, significantly liberalized its online agreement in favor of libraries and their users. The new terms are posted online, but we haven't gone back to those institutions who signed the earlier agreements to either 'force' or 'ask' them to sign the new agreement. That's because, in our case, we are willing to honor either version of the deal. Then, at renewal time, I would think the new terms would come into play...Does this strike you/others as sensible? Mike Spinella ______________________________ Reply Separator _____________________ Subject: Re: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sign l Author: Rick Anderson <rick_anderson@uncg.edu> at Internet Date: 3/1/99 11:07 PM > I am curious to know whether libraries find publishers notify them of > changes in licensing terms since the contract for a particular product was > signed. It seems to me that once terms are agreed to and signed, that version of the terms is the legally binding one. I wouldn't imagine that either party can simply impose new terms unilaterally with any sort of enforceable consequence. How true that is in any given case is limited by the language in the termination clause, I guess -- if the license expires a year after signing, then I suppose you have to negotiate again at that point. But I can't imagine that the vendor has any legal right to simply change the terms unilaterally, any more than the customer does. Am I mistaken about this? ---------------------- Rick Anderson Head Acquisitions Librarian Jackson Library UNC Greensboro 1000 Spring Garden St. Greensboro, NC 27402-6175 PH (336) 334-5281 FX (336) 334-5399 rick_anderson@uncg.edu http://www.uncg.edu/~r_anders "All beauty today is meretricious." -- Fredric Jameson "But beauty is found in life far more than in art. If we avert our eyes to escape the seduction, what will our eyes be good for?" -- David Bromwich
- Prev by Date: Re: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sign licenses
- Next by Date: No Subject
- Prev by thread: No Subject
- Next by thread: Re: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sign licenses
- Index(es):