[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sign licenses
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sign licenses
- From: Rick Anderson <rick_anderson@uncg.edu>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 23:07:11 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> I am curious to know whether libraries find publishers notify them of > changes in licensing terms since the contract for a particular product was > signed. It seems to me that once terms are agreed to and signed, that version of the terms is the legally binding one. I wouldn't imagine that either party can simply impose new terms unilaterally with any sort of enforceable consequence. How true that is in any given case is limited by the language in the termination clause, I guess -- if the license expires a year after signing, then I suppose you have to negotiate again at that point. But I can't imagine that the vendor has any legal right to simply change the terms unilaterally, any more than the customer does. Am I mistaken about this? ---------------------- Rick Anderson Head Acquisitions Librarian Jackson Library UNC Greensboro 1000 Spring Garden St. Greensboro, NC 27402-6175 PH (336) 334-5281 FX (336) 334-5399 rick_anderson@uncg.edu http://www.uncg.edu/~r_anders "All beauty today is meretricious." -- Fredric Jameson "But beauty is found in life far more than in art. If we avert our eyes to escape the seduction, what will our eyes be good for?" -- David Bromwich
- Prev by Date: Re: Authority to sign licenses: How much staff time?
- Next by Date: Re: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sign licenses
- Prev by thread: Re[2]: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sig
- Next by thread: Re: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sign licenses
- Index(es):