[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Triple Licenses
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Triple Licenses
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 23:11:03 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Back to Bernie Sloan's "triple licensing" question: I talked this over with one of our contract/copyright attorneys at Yale. She believes the question of which license would trump which in the case of the 3-layered Vendor/State library/end user case was impossible to answer without seeing each specific agreement and determiing whether any provisions are or could be in conflict, for starters. Let's say the end-user contract contains clauses that state that no other agreements govern the subject matter in question (not uncommon apparently). In that case, if the Library agreement with the vendor (via the State Library) contained such a clause, the user could argue that her terms of use were governed by that third Library agreement alone. In any case, our attorney's opinion was that, as in all contract questions, the specific language at issue is key and one needs to know what it says in order to answer Bernie's question. Ann Okerson Ann.Okerson@yale.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Click-through Licenses
- Next by Date: Re: Authors Rights
- Prev by thread: 'Double' licenses
- Next by thread: Consortia advantages?, was: Re: paper on libraries and publishers
- Index(es):