[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SOLINET and Lexis-Nexis
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: SOLINET and Lexis-Nexis
- From: Rick Anderson <rick_anderson@uncg.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 19:14:24 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
We're in the process of subscribing to Academic UNIVERSE, a Lexis-Nexis product, through SOLINET, our regional consortium. As the one charged with vetting license agreements here at UNCG, I have been somewhat taken aback by the fact that SOLINET and Lexis-Nexis have separate sets of license terms to which we must agree. Most curiously of all, SOLINET's version refers to the Lexis-Nexis version as "the entire agreement." (Legally speaking, if SOLINET and Lexis-Nexis both agree that the Lexis-Nexis version is the entire agreement, doesn't that make the rest of SOLINET's agreement irrelevant?) Perhaps not surprisingly, the two sets of terms do not agree perfectly; to make things even more complicated, the Lexis-Nexis document includes a separate paragraph of specific terms for each of the 56 publishers whose material is provided by Academic UNIVERSE. Some of the publisher-specific terms are fine, but others are not acceptable. So what I've got here is a huge, sprawling and only intermittently appropriate set of terms from the vendor which is somehow wedded to separate set of terms from the consortium. I've been in touch with my SOLINET rep, but while I wait for a response I'd be very interested to know how others have dealt with this. I'm sure I'm not the only one in this situation... ---------------------- Rick Anderson Head Acquisitions Librarian Jackson Library UNC Greensboro 1000 Spring Garden St. Greensboro, NC 27402-6175 PH (336) 334-5281 FX (336) 334-5399 rick_anderson@uncg.edu http://www.uncg.edu/~r_anders "A good newspaper is never quite good enough, but a lousy newspaper is a joy forever." -- Garrison Keillor
- Prev by Date: Re: American Society for Microbiology
- Next by Date: Re: SOLINET and Lexis-Nexis
- Next by thread: Re: SOLINET and Lexis-Nexis
- Index(es):