[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: copyright issues of scanned articles
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: copyright issues of scanned articles
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 20:12:15 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sally Morris of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers of the UK (ALPSP) writes the following: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "ALPSP" <alpsp@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Subject: Re: copyright issues of scanned articles Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 16:05:34 -0000 I was careful to write 'publisher AND other copyright owner'. In addition to copyright in the text itself, there are also rights (for a shorter period) in the appearance of the page - the 'typographical arrangement'- which always reside with the publisher. Thus the publisher's permission is also required. There is, at present, no copyright exception under any legislation, as far as I know, for digitisation. I am forwarding this message to others who can provide first-hand details both of the STM/EBLIDA agreement, and of the HERON scheme. Sally Morris -----Original Message----- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu> To: Liblicense <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Date: 30 October 1998 23:45 Subject: Re: copyright issues of scanned articles >In reference to Sally Morris's first paragraph below, I'd think it should >read "no digitisation can be legally carried out without the explicit >permission of the **copyright owner** (not "publisher"). I would modify >it further as follows, " or unless otherwise lawfully permitted." The >publisher may not be the owner of the copyright; and "no digitisation" is >too blanket, I would argue, an assertion. > >The rest of the message, which references specific broad-based >library/publisher agreements or licenses that permit digitisation without >explicit publisher permission each time (presuming the publisher owns the >rights), is most interesting. I think many of us not in UK or Europe >would like to hear more about HERON and the EBLIDA agreements, please. > >Ann Okerson >Ann.Okerson@yale.edu > >_________________________________ > >On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Sally Morris wrote: > >> At present, no digitisation can be legally carried out without the >> explicit permission of the publisher and any other copyright owner (who >> may or may not require a fee) and under the terms specified by them. > >[SNIP] > >> Sally Morris, Secretary-General >> Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers >> South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK >> >> Phone: 01903 871686 Fax: 01903 871286 E-mail: >> alpsp@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk
- Next by Date: Re: EBLIDA/ECUP/STM Joint Statement
- Prev by thread: Re: EBLIDA/ECUP/STM Joint Statement
- Next by thread: Re: copyright issues of scanned articles
- Index(es):