[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- From: "Sloan, Bernie" <bernies@uillinois.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 15:25:07 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Just out of curiousity, what, if any, implications does a case like this have for other methods of "reselling" journal articles electronically? I realize that what UnCover does is different from what an IAC or a UMI offers via their full text article databases, or what individual publishers do when they offer electronic versions of their journals. I am just curious about the potential impacts of "authors rights" issues on the electronic packaging and re-packaging of journal articles. Bernie Sloan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- From: Irvin Muchnick <irvmuch@yahoo.com> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: UnCover copyright case FEDERAL COURT AFFIRMS AUTHORS' RIGHTS IN CLASS-ACTION COPYRIGHT SUIT AGAINST DIALOG'S UNCOVER A federal court in San Francisco has ruled against the Dialog Corporation's UnCover service on the issue of authors; rights in commercial copying as part of a class-action copyright infringement lawsuit by freelance authors. In a summary judgment order issued October 13, United States District Court Judge Fern M. Smith ruled that, under Section 201(c) of the Copyright Act, permission from authors is required for reproduction of their articles from collective works such as magazines and journals. In October 1997, the authors sued UnCover, which is owned and operated by the CARL Corporation and Dialog, charging that UnCover violates authors' copyrights by reselling previously published articles without permission. UnCover sells over 1,000 articles a day via an Internet index from 17,000 magazines and journals. Customers pay up to $10 per article copy. The district court's ruling coincided with the emergence of new evidence that UnCover's practices included permanent storage of scanned articles on optical disks. The evidence called into question sworn statements made to the court by Ward Shaw, chairman and CEO of CARL and one of the founders of UnCover. In a declaration to the court dated October 15, Shaw admitted that he had made "inaccurate" statements in prior testimony. Shaw had stated that articles were electronically stored for resale only when publishers granted permission. Shaw's admission confirmed the plaintiffs' allegations that UnCover stores optical images of every article it delivers without regard to prior permission. Shaw added that the company henceforth would stop this practice. Judge Smith then directed the defendants to certify to the court by October 23 that UnCover's electronic storage devices - known as WORM disks - have not been altered since the filing of the lawsuit. John D. Shuff, an attorney for the plaintiff-authors, said: "We are pleased with the court's affirmation of authors' rights under Section 201(c) of the Copyright Act. We are also disturbed by the defendants' misrepresentations about permanent storage, which tended to mislead libraries, information consumers and the court into viewing UnCover as a harmless transitional copying service. Our discovery that UnCover has been creating its own digital anthology of articles, often without authorization from any rights holder, compounds the legacy of the defendants' longstanding "sell first, ask permission later" practices, and reinforces that this is a classic case of piracy against both publishers *and* authors." UnCover was started by CARL in 1988. Both Denver-based companies were purchased in 1995 by Knight-Ridder Information, Inc. Last year Knight-Ridder Information was sold to the British information company M.A.I.D, which renamed the combined entity the Dialog Corporation plc. The plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit against UnCover, CARL and Dialog are being represented by Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi and the Law Offices of Daniel A. Reidy. Media coverage of the 201(c) ruling has appeared in the Associated Press, the *Chronicle of Higher Education*, and the website of the *National Law Journal*. The latter article can be accessed at <http://www.ljx.com/LJXfiles/ freelance.html>. I am a consultant for the plaintiffs' attorneys. Authors or others are invited to contact me at <irvmuch@yahoo.com>. Bernie Sloan Senior Library Information Systems Consultant University of Illinois Office for Planning & Budgeting 338 Henry Administration Building 506 S. Wright Street Urbana, IL 61801 Phone: (217) 333-4895 Fax: (217) 333-6355 Email: bernies@uillinois.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: EB online
- Next by Date: Library liability and Net access
- Prev by thread: No Subject
- Next by thread: The new Science site license
- Index(es):