[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The new Science site license
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: The new Science site license
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 21:08:04 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Science magazine now, finally, has a site license publicly available for institutions. (see http://www.sciencemag.org/subscriptions/libinfo.shtml). There are some distinctive features: I. 5.Science Online subscriptions allow access to the full text database of all Science issues published on the Web over the course of a period of 51 weeks (a one year subscription). There is no physical archive provided with this subscrption. Online subscribers are encouraged to purchase a print subscription for archiving purposes. In other words, the library is purchasing only a one year window. II. Site-wide Subscriptions - desktop access by IP address for the entire institution. ....... Educational institutions: Total number of employees and students. All other institutions: Total number of employees. Site-wide Subscription Rates FTE Count <1000 1000-2999 3000-11,999 12,000-25,000 >25,000 Rate $1500.00 $2500.00 $3500.00 $4500.00 $5500.00 Connection fee for each affiliated remote site is $250.00 2. Library Workstation Subscriptions - online access by IP address for workstations that are physically located in a library. Price: $25.00 per workstation. Minimum order is 10 workstations if the library does not have a Science print subscription. -- This means that for site-wide access, my university would need to pay $3500; we currently have 10 institutional print subscriptions with one workstation access each, at a total cost of 10(295+25)=$3,0000. To change to a site license would cost us 117% more than what we now pay, or 119% above the print price. And this would be only for a one year window! I am speaking only for myself, but I consider this exceptionally poor value, and I hope the other selectors here agree with me. In my view, for a publisher to offer libraries a one year window would only be appropriate for access to an electronic version supplied without extra cost, as a bonus for the print subscribers. I think most of us would not pay for access to the current year only of a print journal. Although I recognize that subscription costs per se are not really a concern of this list, I think the general concept of the extent of any appropriate differential costs for print and online is relevant, as are some specific examples. David Goodman Biology Librarian, Princeton University Library dgoodman@princeton.edu http://www.princeton.edu/~biolib/ phone: 609-258-3235 fax: 609-258-2627
- Prev by Date: Re: **NEW LIBLICENSE SOFTWARE AVAILABLE**
- Next by Date: Re: The new Science site license
- Prev by thread: No Subject
- Next by thread: Re: The new Science site license
- Index(es):