[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: SciFinder Scholar Contract (fwd)
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: SciFinder Scholar Contract (fwd)
- From: "Rickerson, George" <RickersonG@umsystem.edu>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 15:53:50 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
We recently licensed SciFinder Scholar for the University of Missouri. This product is different from most that we trial in that CAS had to "loan" us client software in order for us to be able to try the product out. For most other products we try, if we don't buy, the service is turned off and the vendor has no exposure. For SciFinder Scholar, after the trial we would still have the client software and, in the absence of an agreement, could give it away or otherwise do things with it that CAS doesn't want us to do. All in all it does seem reasonable for CAS to want an agreement in place before loaning the client software to a customer. ************************************ George Rickerson, Director Library Systems Office University of Missouri 615 Locust Street #200 Columbia, MO 65211 rickersong@umsystem.edu 573-882-7233 573-882-6107 fax ************************************ > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Kraus [mailto:jokraus@du.edu] > Sent: Sunday, October 18, 1998 4:23 PM > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: Re: SciFinder Scholar Contract (fwd) > >The Univ. of Denver is considering getting CAS's SciFinder Scholar >product. However, even before we can trial the database and >the interface for 30 days, we need to sign a contract agreement with them >before the trial. After talking with the CAS rep - Christopher Faine - I >learned that we could not sign two agreements, one for the trial, and >then one for the paid license. (Maybe it is more of a case for the CAS >to /strongly prefer/ one contract?) Once we sign a contract for the >trial, it would presumably be the same contract for the license, thus we >could not make any changes. > >I do not see how it makes sense for us to involve our lawyer to look at >the legal wording of a contract BEFORE a decision on purchase >is made. I would want our lawyer to make any necessary changes to the >contract AFTER the University has made a decision to purchase. But, I >guess that CAS will not allow such changes. > >I know that other institutions can't divulge the details of their contract >agreements with the CAS, but I would like to know how others >have dealt with similar situations - whether from the CAS or not. > >I usually do not concern myself with vendor contracts, so I don't >know if this is typical of the CAS. (ie. We must sign a contract BEFORE >agreeing to purchase.) I do know that many other science info vendors are >much more open to giving 30 day trials without making you sign a contract >first. > >Do I have any alternatives? Any thoughts - ideas? > ________________________________________________________________ > Joseph R. Kraus Science Librarian Penrose Library > Univ. of Denver 2150 E. Evans Denver, CO 80208 > (303) 871-4586 jokraus@du.edu http://www.du.edu/~jokraus
- Prev by Date: Re: SciFinder Scholar Contract (fwd)
- Next by Date: Re: Contract English Assistance Needed
- Prev by thread: Re: SciFinder Scholar Contract (fwd)
- Next by thread: Re: SciFinder Scholar Contract (fwd)
- Index(es):