[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Cambridge Survey Replies
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Cambridge Survey Replies
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 20:30:13 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Ann Gabriel of Cambridge University Press writes: Date: 12 Aug 98 16:11:55 -0400 From: Ann Gabriel <agabriel@cup.org> Cc: Laraine Karl <lkarl@cup.org> Subject: Thanks It looks as if the last of the responses to the survey you so kindly allowed us to post on the list serv have come in. If you see fit, please post the following note of thanks and shared feedback for subscribers. Best wishes, Ann Gabriel Electronic Information Marketing Manager ________________________________________________________ NOTICE: A special thanks to all of you who took the time to respond to Cambridge University Press's survey regarding library requirements for electronic databases. A primary goal of the survey was to determine whether or not libraries preferred internet or CD-ROM access to electronic information. We received 52 responses, nearly 100% in favor of internet over CD-ROM access to information. The results of an identical printed direct mail survey sent to a random selection of 500 university libraries are still coming in. Feedback from the printed survey appears to be largely in favor of internet access although not unanimous. Most valuable of all were the comments supplied by the subscribers on this list, anonymous highlights of which are posted below. Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance with our project. It is greatly appreciated. "CD-ROM's are difficult to make available over a network. We are currently having to buy a whole new round of hardware for this purpose: it is expensive. Technology keeps changing, interfaces become obsolete. Internet connections are much easier. We prefer the publisher to "serve up" the data and save us the local effort." " . . . RUNNING CDS ON A NETWORK IS A HUGE PAIN, AND REQUIRES SKILLS AND MANHOURS INCREASINGLY HARD TO GET. WHEN THESE COSTS ARE FACTORED IN CD-ROMS ARE JUST TOO EXPENSIVE. THE COST IS ONGOING AND OPEN-ENDED, EXPECIALLY IF THERE ARE FREQUENT UPDATES. INTERNET PRODUCTS REQUIRE SETTING UP ONLY ONCE." "INTERNET PRODUCTS ARE MUCH EASIER FOR AN INSTITUTION TO MANAGE, AS FAR AS ACCESSIBILITY GOES. (ANY INSTITUTION WORKSTATION WITH A BROWSER CAN ACCESS THE PRODUCT.) IT'S EASIER FOR THE LIBRARIAN THAN MAINTAINING ALL OF THE LAN CONNECTIONS NECESSARY FOR CD-ROM ACCESSIBILITY." "We are very reluctant to invest in expensive CD-ROM products at this point because of issues such as the heavy requirement for staff support and the question of the very limited lifespan we can currently expect for Cd-ROM based information systems. Even if the disks last longer than a few years, the systems that make them accessible may no longer be effectively available to us. Internet-based systems seem more likely to simply roll over into new forms that do not require us to buy the data again at some future date." "ABSOLUTELY PREFER WEB VERSION .. WANT TO PRESUME CAMPUS-WIDE ACCESS BY IP RANGE." "For internet access - if simultaneous users are restricted, then we like to have a cd-rom in the library as well as internet access. If we pay by simultaneous user rather than site, then we try to get a cd-rom version at the price of one additional user. Our University (like many) have a real push for distance or distributed learning - since we are a very rapidly growing institution, we cannot build enough classrooms to house all the potential students - for our institution distance/distributed learning means providing classes via the internet to students who would normally come to campus if there were classrooms and parking spaces. The library needs to support the research and support for these students, so we are trying to get as many resources as possible accessible via the internet." "WE ARE BUYING AS FEW CDS AS POSSIBLE. INTERNET IS MUCH PREFERABLE. MUCH LESS DEPENDENT ON THE ODDITIES OF LOCAL NETWORKS. WE TRY TO DELIVER EVERYTHING AT THE DESKTOP AND WITH CDS THAT IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE." "We are a multi-site organization; internet access erases all geographical and firewall barriers which are encountered with cd-rom products." "No one seems to being doing anything about the archiving problem. Libraries cannot maintain electronic and print subscriptions indefinitely. I'd not publish cd-rom versions of your products. The Internet subscriptions can be used by more students at the same time and accomodate distance learners. Producing on cd-rom is an out-of-date technology." "Unless the database is very narrow and of interest to only a handful of people, we want Internet access." "We have decided to purchase only those CD-ROM products that provide information that is not available through Internet-accessible databases. Since we do not have a CD network, Internet databases provide wider access for our patrons." Sincerely, Ann Gabriel Electronic Information Marketing Manager Cambridge University Press
- Prev by Date: Re: Oxford and Cambridge UP..
- Next by Date: Re: Copyright collectives and libraries
- Prev by thread: Re: Copyright collectives and libraries
- Next by thread: Re: Oxford and Cambridge UP
- Index(es):