Previous by Date |
Index by Date
Threaded Index |
Next by Date |
---|---|---|
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread |
From the Liblicense-l Owners
Dear 800 or so Liblicense-l subscribers: A large number of you have signed up in a very short time to this list, suggesting there is a keen interest in the topic of electronic content licensing on the part of librarians, information providers, and creators. While you have been signing up, your listowners have been busy learning a new listsproc software running on a new server and we think we have the first mysteries solved. Therefore, we urge you to jump in and share your experiences and questions with the rest of the (still growing) group of subscribers. Let me pose a basic question here, one for the library community which in turn might inform our friends the licensors. When you receive a contract from a content provider and see clauses in it that you would like to the publisher/provider to change, how do you go about doing it? What success do you have in securing changes? What sorts of changes do you most often request? That may be enough questions to last for some time. Insights and short case studies are welcome here. In turn, perhaps our publishers will offer their perspectives and comments, so that we can all move forward together. Our objective in providing the Liblicense Web Site and this list is, after all, to help us all understand better the licensing process and content and to get to the point where much of what we all propose is, if not "boilerplate," then conforming to a set of to-be-defined "best practices" so that the time all parties spend on each license can be reduced. That's a worthy goal, in any case. Yours, The Moderators Ann Okerson Rodney Stenlake, Esq. (the lawyer among us)
http://www.library.yale.edu/liblicense © 1996, 1997 Yale University Library |
Please read our Disclaimer E-mail us with feedback |