[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Liblicense reading group
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Liblicense reading group
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:45:09 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
MediaCommons was set up by Kathleen Fitzpatrick for just this kind of purpose. It was used to conduct the pre-publication review. Sandy Thatcher At 8:00 PM -0500 11/9/11, Joseph Esposito wrote: >[MODERATOR: How about a Joe and a few of the interested folks do >some corresponding off-list and come back with a more definite >proposal sometime in 2011 -- soon to be history. It may be that >CRL, to whose servers liblicense will be moving, would be happy >to host and support a relevant online reading group. For now, >shall have an exchange among those folks who've indicated an >interest, and we can include anyone else who drops me a line at: ><aokerson@gmail.com>. Does this work?] > >When I playfully tossed out the suggestion that there be a >liblicense reading group, I didn't expect anyone to take me up on >it. But now there are at least 3 supportive voices, and unless I >am tone deaf, it appears the idea is being taken seriously. > >But first I must confess that the book I mentioned, Laurence >Cosse's "A Novel Bookstore," is one that I already read--and >about which I just wrote a short review on the Scholarly Kitchen: ><http://j.mp/toLPCJ> or ><http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/11/09/a-novel-bookstore-a-review/> > >The book is fun, but small (in the sense, every sense, that >Proust is large). It is notable for this list because it >concerns curation and a form of peer review. > >It's not clear to me what it would mean to create such a reading >group. The first question I have is, What software is best for >such a group? With so many social media platforms to choose from >(I literally get invited to 1-2 every day--and this, of course, >cannot last), which one is best for a book discussion? Any >suggestions? > >There are countless questions of policy and protocol, which I >won't raise unless the general topic interests enough people. > >Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Re: Future of the "subscription model?"
- Next by Date: Re: Future of the "subscription model?"
- Previous by thread: Liblicense reading group
- Next by thread: Re: ALPSP Maximising your Secondary Rights, London 12/7/11
- Index(es):