[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UK's Unbound Lets A-listers, Aspirants Pitch for Cash to Publish
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: UK's Unbound Lets A-listers, Aspirants Pitch for Cash to Publish
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:36:08 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Yes, but it does help lend credibility to the idea that a crowd-funding model could be successfully used for scholarly book publishing. Thanks, Eric, for this interesting analysis of three different approaches in this vein. Sandy Thatcher >It's worth noting that there are no open-access aspects to >Unbound. The publisher still sells the books; it just outsources >the advance. > >http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2011/05/unbound-wants-to-be-kickstarter-for.html > >On Sep 2, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Sandy Thatcher wrote: > >> At last year's Charleston Conference I gave a talk titled "Back >> to the Future" in which I promoted the idea of crowdsource >> financing as one way toward moving scholarly book publishing >> toward an open-access model. The paper I later published in >> Against the Grain (Feb. 2011) is available here: >> >> http://www.psupress.org/news/SandyThatchersWritings.html >> >> I'm delighted to see that this idea is beginning to be put into >> practice, albeit not specifically in scholarly publishing. >> >> Sandy Thatcher
- Prev by Date: MHRA 2012 Journal Price List
- Next by Date: Re: Guardian on research publishing
- Previous by thread: Re: UK's Unbound Lets A-listers, Aspirants Pitch for Cash to Publish
- Next by thread: September 2011 issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Index(es):