[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Faulty Open Access FAQ
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Faulty Open Access FAQ
- From: Stevan Harnad <amsciforum@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:48:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
[Apologies for Cross-Posting. Hyperlinked version: http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/825-guid.html ] A FAQ should inform rather than misinform, but unfortunately the "Frequently asked Questions zu Open Access und Zweitveroeffentlichungsrecht (FAQ)" -- http://www.allianzinitiative.de/fileadmin/user_upload/FAQ_Open_Access_Zweitveroeffentlichungsrecht.pdf -- of Germany's Allianz der deutschen Wissenschaftsorganisationen (ADW) perpetuates several widespread and longstanding misunderstandings about Open Access. The misunderstandings are mostly in the form of two unreflective reversals of practical and strategic priorities, insisting, prematurely, on far less urgent and important and much less reachable OA goals, while neglecting or even rejecting far more urgent and important OA goals that are already fully within reach. (1) Gratis OA vs Libre OA: Gratis OA is (1a) free online access to refereed journal articles. Libre OA is (1a) free online access to refereed journal articles (1b) plus certain further re-use and re-publication rights. We do not yet even have Gratis OA (1a), but it is already fully within reach; yet the ADW FAQ insists on Libre OA (1b), rejecting Gratis OA (1a) as not good enough. (2) Green OA vs Gold OA: Green OA is (2a) Gratis OA to the author's final refereed drafts of all refereed journal articles, provided through author self-archiving of all refereed journal articles. Gold OA OA is (2b) Gratis or Libre OA to articles published in OA journals. We do not yet even have Green OA (2a), but it is already fully within reach; yet the ADW FAQ insists on Gold OA (1b), rejecting Green OA (1a) as not good enough. This kind of counterproductive over-reaching is a formula for yet another decade of attaining minimal OA of any kind. For correctives, see the longstanding BOAI Self-Archiving FAQ -- http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/self-faq/ -- and especially #23 ("Version Control"), #31 ("Waiting for Gold"), #36 ("Re-Use") and #37 ("Permissions"). What the ADW FAQ should be explaining and advocating is that the worldwide research community should first grasp what is already within its immediate reach, namely, Green Gratis OA self-archiving -- through institutional and funders Green Gratis OA self-archiving mandates (requirements). Only after the immensely beneficial immediate benefit for research that is already within reach (universal Green Gratis OA) has been grasped should we be thinking of going on to Gold OA publishing and Libre OA re-use/republication rights. Stevan Harnad EnablingOpenScholarship http://www.openscholarship.org/
- Prev by Date: Re: RSS Feed Created for liblicense-l
- Next by Date: Librarian position in WHO EURO is open for applications
- Previous by thread: ASPET Journals for Mobile Devices
- Next by thread: Librarian position in WHO EURO is open for applications
- Index(es):