[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: non-negotiation license question
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: non-negotiation license question
- From: "Scott Stangroom" <stangroom@library.umass.edu>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 18:21:08 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Judy - Thank you for your comments. I appreciate what you're saying, and perhaps what I asked of Matt was crass. Nevertheless, what he reports speaks of the increasing arrogance and unprofessional nature of some companies who do business with libraries. I am not at all empathetic towards businesses whose practice it seems is to highjack copyright, and control our purses. Yes, I agree, praise when praise is earned, but I think we should also call out when responsibility is warranted. Otherwise we will continue to face more and more restrictive use terms, promises of confidentiality, and the deterioration of rights of fair use and the like. Scott ______________________ Scott Stangroom Acquisitions Coordinator University of Massachusetts, Amherst W.E.B. Du Bois Library Acquisitions Dept. Amherst, MA 01003-9275 stangroom@library.umass.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Schwartz, Judy Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 6:48 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: non-negotiation license question Scott - probably if each one of us responded individually to Matt, he'd say. However it is always a tricky business to call out a particular vendor on any professional list - unless of course it's a positive response. Judy Schwartz Director of Library Services Trocaire College http://library.trocaire.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Stangroom Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 7:21 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: non-negotiation license question We have not at UMass Amherst. I think you should cancel and I also think you should tell us who the publisher is - we should not let these people bully us the way they try to do. Scott ______________________ Scott Stangroom Acquisitions Coordinator University of Massachusetts, Amherst W.E.B. Du Bois Library Acquisitions Dept. Amherst, MA 01003-9275 stangroom@library.umass.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Matthew Person Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 9:20 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: non-negotiation license question A major publisher from whom we purchase 15% worth of our serials has told us that our single non-serial purchase from them will be covered by a new non-negotiation policy license which will only require our signature. This "non-negotiation" license is indeed the publisher's standard license. The license itself references nothing having to do with "non-negotiation" The publisher won't answer questions about their policy, so we find ourselves considering cancellation of this valuable resource, because of such low quality customer support and awareness. Has anyone recently encountered any similar situation? Thanks, Matt Person Matthew Person Technical Services Coordinator MBLWHOI Library MBL Center for Library and Informatics
- Prev by Date: blog posting (parable of innovation)
- Next by Date: Problems with Euromonitor
- Previous by thread: RE: non-negotiation license question
- Next by thread: Re: non-negotiation license question
- Index(es):