[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: non-negotiation license question
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: non-negotiation license question
- From: Jean-Claude Guedon <jean.claude.guedon@umontreal.ca>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 18:53:37 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
If commercial institutions, benefiting from their command of a panoptic position over the libraries, are thereby able to design a "divide and conquer" strategy, is it not only fair to respond by identifying them? Courtesies are nice, and people who want to maintain them are to be admired, but should we go so far as to extend them to entities engaged in playing power games for lucrative ends? If someone were to hit you in an alley, and you could later prove the relationship between the name and the act, would you refuse to publicize the name in the name of civility? Jean-Claude Guedon Le vendredi 29 avril 2011 Schwartz, Judy a ecrit: > Scott - probably if each one of us responded individually to > Matt, he'd say. However it is always a tricky business to call > out a particular vendor on any professional list - unless of > course it's a positive response. > > Judy Schwartz > Director of Library Services > Trocaire College > http://library.trocaire.edu
- Next by Date: Request for long URLs also
- Next by thread: RE: non-negotiation license question
- Index(es):