[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Embargoes on Deposit in Repositories
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Fwd: Embargoes on Deposit in Repositories
- From: David Prosser <david.prosser@rluk.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 22:09:44 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It is, of course, the Open Access Implementation Group (OAIG), not (OAWG). Yet another failure of clarity on my part! David Begin forwarded message: > From: David Prosser <david.prosser@rluk.ac.uk> > Date: 1 April 2011 13:04:27 GMT+01:00 > To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> > Subject: Re: Embargoes on Deposit in Repositories > > Cliff > > a) I never claimed that I was a model of clarity. Just that Sandy's description added ambiguity rather than removing it. > > b) If it makes it easier to understand then please do replace 'authors' manuscript' with 'Author's Original and/or Submitted Manuscript Under Review and/or Accepted Manuscript'. > > c) There are indeed differences between pre- and post-refereed versions, but the OAWG statement applies to both. Hence my shorthand. > > Best wishes > > David >
- Prev by Date: Dramatic Growth of Open Access and those ACTIVE open access journa=
- Next by Date: Report of Library E-Book Acquisitions Survey
- Previous by thread: Re: Embargoes on Deposit in Repositories
- Next by thread: Announcing the 3rd Conference on Open Access Scholarly Publishing
- Index(es):