[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: "subsidy"
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: "subsidy"
- From: Todd Puccio <puccio@nova.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:31:26 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The term "subsidy" is only rightly used when a Government or Philanthropic organization gives its money to another company or organization that is not currently profitable for the sake of the common good. It would not be correct to use the term within your own organization. Such an action as you describe below is merely covering costs of a loss leader. Likewise, "subsidy" cannot be equated with "investment" unless there was a pre-arrangement with the organization that receives the subsidy that at some future time they would pay back the subsidy with interest and/or provide other benefit directly back to the donating government body or philanthropic organization. If the term "investment" is widened to include "the common good," Then all "subsidies" are investments, plain and simple. Not all investments are wise or profitable. The term itself is value neutral. Only its intended targets can have value assigned to them. T. Puccio
- Prev by Date: Re: "subsidy"
- Next by Date: Yet a better URL
- Previous by thread: Re: "subsidy"
- Next by thread: Transcript of Charleston presentation
- Index(es):