[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Publisher Genealogy
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Publisher Genealogy
- From: "Peter B. Hirtle" <pbh6@cornell.edu>
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:17:25 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
My unofficial understanding is that the FOB database was built by Texas and Reading from research they had to do for their own projects. Like the WATCH (Writers, Artists, and their Copyright Holders) File, it is dependent on the community to help keep it current. As the "About FOB" page notes, "FOB is a much newer and less complete file than WATCH. The compilers would welcome submissions of additional information for FOB from users of the WATCH and FOB websites and from others with specialist knowledge in literary and publishing history." I have passed on to the people at Texas the excellent suggestions of resources that have been posted to the Liblicense list. If you have additional information about specific firms, I know the compilers would welcome it. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense- > l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Anthony Watkinson > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:29 PM > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: RE: Publisher Genealogy > > Peter is I know much more knowledgeable about these things than I > am but I have looked up one company of great interest to me > because I worked for it for eleven years and I find that the > entry is at least thirteen years out of date. How is this > resource updated? It is probably not much used to librarians > trying to find current owners unless it is a little more current > I would feel. > > Anthony
- Prev by Date: Re: Another Poynder Eye-Opener on Open Access
- Next by Date: "subsidy"
- Previous by thread: RE: Publisher Genealogy
- Next by thread: Standard for low e-journal usage reports
- Index(es):