[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
- From: Heather Morrison <hgmorris@sfu.ca>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:11:22 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sandy Thatcher wrote: I hope Heather is not seriously making the claim that truth is established by the greater number of articles that purport to prove a citation advantage. Comment: my framework is the evidence based librarianship movement, inspired by evidence based medicine. It is not just the number of studies that is to be taken into account, but also such matters as sample size and rigor of the studies. The idea is to base decisions and recommendations on the full weight of available evidence. It is in this context that I assert that the weight of the evidence strongly supports an open access citation impact advantage. For more information on evidence based librarianship, see this overview article by Jonathan D. Eldredge in the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC35250/ Or, browse the open access peer-reviewed journal Evidence Based Library and Information Practice; http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP Heather Morrison, MLIS Doctoral Candidate, Simon Fraser University School of Communication http://pages.cmns.sfu.ca/heather-morrison/ The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
- Prev by Date: RE: Peggy Hoon on licenses
- Next by Date: Re: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
- Next by thread: Re: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
- Index(es):