[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interview with Springer's Derk Haank
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Interview with Springer's Derk Haank
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:17:30 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I think Derk Haank's remarks were provocative, perhaps deliberately so. I just blogged about this at the Kitchen: http://bit.ly/eEwmzo The real question is, depending on where you sit, what do you do about this? I am not aware that the expression of moral outrage, however justified, has made much of a dent in trading practices. Indeed, I am not aware of any strategy currently being tested that is likely to change the nature of the current marketplace. New ideas are needed. Joe Esposito On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Diane Grover <grover@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > The University of Washington has been and continues to experience > exactly what Ivy Anderson warns in her excellent posts. Budget > decreases, mid-year rescissions, and threatened further cuts have > left us with our backs against the wall. To borrow from Ivy, > we've already hit the proverbial iceberg. > > The big deals have been priced based on historical subscriptions. > If we still were able to maintain our own subscription lists, we > would have been cancelling journals that are included in bundles > for the last several years. But the bundle deals insist on zero > to minimal cancellations, percentage increases, and even require > adding titles the publishers start up or take over from others. > If costs go up every year, and our revenue goes down, there is > clearly a sustainability problem. > <snip>
- Prev by Date: PKP Conference
- Next by Date: Announcing Open Attribute
- Previous by thread: Re: Interview with Springer's Derk Haank
- Next by thread: Re: PDA Sales: (was: Interview with Springer's Derk Haank)
- Index(es):