[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Does Google Book Scanning Devalue Libraries?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Does Google Book Scanning Devalue Libraries?
- From: Philip Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:28:30 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In an equally compelling comment to Rick Anderson's Google Book Settlement, Todd Carpenter argues that book scanning has devalued libraries and that university librarians (especially those who led the flock into the agreement with Google) should not start playing victim. "to start complaining that the work is going to only provide Google with an unencumbered monopoly on the world's greatest library ever compiled seems to me the worst form of Monday-morning quarterbacking. It is hardly as if the various participating libraries weren't sitting at the table and taking these decisions about what would happen, when and how." see: http://j.mp/euOBt2
- Prev by Date: RE: Terms subject to change
- Next by Date: Interview with Vitek Tracz re-published and updated
- Previous by thread: RE: Terms subject to change
- Next by thread: Re: Does Google Book Scanning Devalue Libraries?
- Index(es):