[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ebooks in libraries
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Ebooks in libraries
- From: Pippa Smart <pippa.smart@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:56:44 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Responding to the comment below about the (lack of) ability to buy individual titles and build e-book collections: Ebrary has launched a "Patron Driven Acquisition" model which allows libraries to pick-and-mix titles from a range of publishers to build their collections. It also allows free trials which activate a purchase/subscription once the user (=patron) has made a specified amount of use of the e-book (e.g. the first 5 downloads are free but the 6th actitates a purchase) which will allow libraries to buy books that their patrons really use (which is not always the case in the print environment). http://www.ebrary.com/corp/librariesPatron.jsp Pippa ***** Pippa Smart Research Communication and Publishing Consultant PSP Consulting Tel: +44 7775 627688 or +44 1865 864255 email: pippa.smart@gmail.com Web: www.pspconsulting.org **** On 1 November 2010 23:10, <J.W.Schoones@lumc.nl> wrote: > Toby, > > Indeed, many publishers have a lot of ebooks to offer. The > observation that they have successfully grappled, cut the knot > and have ebooks available for libraries, is an observation from > the point of view of publishers, not academic libraries. The > problem for academic libraries in this is the fact that > title-by-title acquisition is generally not an option offered > by publishers. And also, in my case (medicine), an important > supplier of books, the publisher Elsevier, does not (yet) offer > an institutional platform for their medical ebooks at all. In > general, yes, a library can buy a whole set or sub-set of > books. But these very pricy sets are not affordable, nor do > these sets have anything to do with collection development. So, > in my view, the publishers have not yet successfully grappled, > did not yet cut the knot and have not yet made ebooks available > for libraries. > > Cordially, > > Jan W. Schoones > Walaeus Library LUMC > j.w.schoones@lumc.nl > www.twitter.com/walaeus > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of > Toby.GREEN@oecd.org > Sent: donderdag 28 oktober 2010 23:46 > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: RE: Ebooks in libraries > > Joe, > > I'm really puzzled by your final comments - "publishers are still > grappling with how to make e-books available to libraries. Who > will be the first to cut the knot?". > > We, along with many other publishers ranging from Elsevier and > Springer to OUP, the World Bank and even World Tourism > Organisation, have successfully grappled, cut the knot and have > ebooks available for libraries, including all front list titles > and many backlist too (in our case, we've got everything back to > 1998 in e-book form, around 5,000 titles in all). > > Have I missed something? > > Toby Green > Head of Publishing > Public Affairs & Communications Directorate OECD > 75775 Paris Cedex 16 > toby.green@oecd.org > www.oecdilibrary.org
- Prev by Date: RE: Ebooks in libraries
- Next by Date: the political science of publishing
- Previous by thread: RE: Ebooks in libraries
- Next by thread: Re: Another take on Wikipedia and (academic) libraries
- Index(es):