[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Looking for successful IRs
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Looking for successful IRs
- From: Rick Anderson <rick.anderson@utah.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:41:52 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The point of the second question is to elicit definitions of "success" from respondents. So, to rephrase: Do you have a successful IR, and if so, can you tell me why you consider it a success? Rick > Rick, How are you going to define success? > > Liz > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Anderson > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 8:20 PM > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: Looking for successful IRs > > A two-part question for the Collective Wisdom: > > 1. Who among us has implemented a truly successful institutional > repository program? > > 2. If you count yours as truly successful, why? > > I was going to ask for off-list responses, but maybe on-list > ones would actually be more helpful for all. I'll leave that > to the discretion of each respondent. > > Thanks in advance. > > Rick Anderson > Assoc. Dir. for Scholarly Resources & Collections > Marriott Library > Univ. of Utah
- Prev by Date: Outsell Pricing Survey 2010 - Invitation
- Next by Date: Role of arXiv
- Previous by thread: Re: Looking for successful IRs
- Next by thread: Nobel Prize in Physics for 2010 Awarded to arXiv Depositors
- Index(es):