[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Update on Georgia State University's copyright infringement case
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Update on Georgia State University's copyright infringement case
- From: "Peter B. Hirtle" <pbh6@cornell.edu>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:13:02 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In my blog posting amplifying on Kevin Smith's post and found at http://blog.librarylaw.com/librarylaw/2010/10/who-infringed-at-georgia-state.html, I directed readers to my discussion of direct and indirect infringement in "Copyright & Cultural Institutions." You might want to start there. The normal standard for a contributory infringer is one who knows, or has reason to know, of an infringing activity, and induces, causes, or materially contributes to that direct infringement. In the Georgia State case, there are at least two issues at play. First, did a direct infringement occur? You can't have contributory infringement without a direct infringement. Since Section 107 of the Copyright Act lists "multiple copies for classroom use" as one of the likely fair uses, this may be an uphill fight. Second, if we assume that direct infringement did occur, did Georgia State contribute to that infringement? Since GSU's policy is aimed at ensuring students and faculty respect copyright, that too may be a difficult argument. As Kevin notes, the final decision will hinge on implementation issues. Should Georgia State, for example, have played a much more direct role in monitoring and controlling what went on in the classroom? By not doing so, did it encourage or materially contribute to infringement by students or faculty? And if Georgia State were to inset itself into the classroom, how would that impact our traditional notions of academic freedom? Peter Hirtle -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:44 AM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Update on Georgia State University's copyright infringement case Can someone on this list help non-legal readers to understand better the concept of "contributory infringement" as understood in this (Georgia State) case? Thank you. On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, B.G. Sloan wrote: >> From Kevin Smith's "Scholarly Communications@Duke" blog: > > http://bit.ly/9lT6Jw > > Bernie Sloan
- Prev by Date: ALPSP - Maximising your Secondary Rights Workshop, London, December 2010
- Next by Date: RE: Update on Georgia State's copyright infringement case
- Previous by thread: Re: Update on Georgia State University's copyright infringement case
- Next by thread: October issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Index(es):