[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The editorial fallacy
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: The editorial fallacy
- From: Terry Ehling <ehling@cornell.edu>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:44:44 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Joe Esposito writes about why publishers need to spend more time on the 'off ramp' side of their business; a front-end strategy focused solely on 'more good books' might be a dead end: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/09/08/the-editorial-fallacy/ Excerpts: "The editorial fallacy is the belief that all of a publisher's strategic problems can be solved by pursuing and publishing the finest books and articles. . . . "Not having the right strategy for digital formats and the new online venues can mean that outstanding books may simply not come to the attention of discriminating readers. A purely editorial strategy is not enough to cut through the thicket of new ebook options. . . . "Many small publishers have chosen to outsource everything but their editorial departments, and if there is a better example of the editorial fallacy at work, I am not aware of it. Some of these very publishers are now frustrated by their outsourcing partners because the partners cannot or will not move quickly enough for certain new initiatives. Who is going to get them onto the iPad? Who is going to help them with the complex issues surrounding PCI compliance?" terry ehling scholarly publishing strategist cornell university ithaca [ny] 14850 ehling@cornell.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Hindawi's Monthly Submissions Grow to Over 2,000
- Next by Date: Electronic Resources & Libraries Seeking Program Proposals
- Previous by thread: Chronicle article
- Next by thread: Electronic Resources & Libraries Seeking Program Proposals
- Index(es):