[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- From: Jan Velterop <velteropvonleyden@btinternet.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:53:52 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Bernd-Christoph, My comments do not constitute an excuse. I asked a question: Why would it be justified to expect a linear reduction in subscription prices? The fallacy is that subscription prices are just a "cost per article times the number of articles published". As if the (realistically expected) number of subscriptions do not matter. Of course they do. Only those who've never been, or looked into the workings of, a publisher can think otherwise. Publishers *do* and should reduce their prices as a result of OA uptake. It's just not the simplistically straightforward and naive calculation some critics expect it to be. I'm not even defending publishers here; I'm defending sound mathematics. Jan Velterop
- Prev by Date: Re: New media example
- Next by Date: RE: Barnes and Noble
- Previous by thread: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- Next by thread: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- Index(es):