[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- From: Fred.Jenkins@notes.udayton.edu
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:39:02 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Jan, That is a fallacy. You are only talking about net publisher revenue, which would make sense if the journal were totally open source and nobody paid for a subscription. But as long as the journals are partly open source and partly subscription model, anyone who wants the full content of the journal has to pay the subscription price. If the same full-price institutional subscriber also pays some open access fees for its authors, the institution is actually paying more than the full subscription price! Even those who don't pay author fees are then still paying "full price" for articles that the authors already have paid to have made open access, which can only be described as an out and out scam. So at bottom you are saying that maintaining net publisher revenues is what defines fair, regardless of how you get there. Fred W. Jenkins, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Collections & Operations & Professor University of Dayton Libraries
- Prev by Date: Re: From Inside Higher Ed
- Next by Date: iPhone 4 for scholars
- Previous by thread: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- Next by thread: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- Index(es):