[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: From Inside Higher Ed
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: From Inside Higher Ed
- From: Bernd-Christoph Kaemper <bernd-christoph.kaemper@ub.uni-stuttgart.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:52:15 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Uptake for OUP's pricey "Oxford Open" paid hybrid-Gold OA option is likely going to decrease further after their recent 40% (in GBP/EUR, 25% in USD) increase in Open Access Publication Charges, effective from December 2009, for authors from subscribing institutions, cf. my messafe from Oct 2009, http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0910/msg00076.html This clearly foils the expectations that the promise to lower OUP journal subscription costs proportionately, as hybrid Gold uptake increases, will have any effect. Double dipping is still occurring here. Cf. again also Stevan Harnads take on this, http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/741-Highly-Misleading-Press-Release-by-Oxford-University-Press-Journals.html Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, Stuttgart University Library MEDDINGS, Colin schrieb: Further to the below - these figures relate to the optional author pays open access initiative, Oxford Open. You can find the news item on our website at: http://www.oxfordjournals.org/news/2010/06/10/open_access.html These figures do not relate to any other form of access, such as via repositories. We have amended the text on our website slightly to clarify this, as there seems to have been some confusion in the reporting of this news. Best wishes, Colin Meddings Senior Library Marketing Manager Oxford Journals | Oxford University Press
- Prev by Date: Barnes and Noble
- Next by Date: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- Previous by thread: RE: From Inside Higher Ed
- Next by thread: Anti-OA spin on Inside Higher Ed (was from Inside Higher Ed)
- Index(es):