[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- From: Laval Hunsucker <amoinsde@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:39:29 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
So clear-cut, in the big real world out there, seriously? It might be nice, but isn't nearly the case, is my experience. Do I detect some slightly rose-colored glasses here? - Laval Hunsucker Knokke, Belgie ----- Original Message ---- From: Ken Masters <kmasters@ithealthed.com> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: Fri, May 14, 2010 6:15:49 AM Subject: RE: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter Hi All Pippa makes the all-important point that decisions to accept or reject papers are made by editors, not publishers. It is this point that is conveniently forgotten when critics of author-pay OA journals accuse those journals of accepting anything, just to increase their revenue. Even in the author-pay model, the decision to accept is made by the editor; the money goes to the journal, not to the editor. Regards Ken ---- Dr. Ken Masters Asst. Professor: Medical Informatics Medical Education Unit College of Medicine & Health Sciences Sultan Qaboos University Sultanate of Oman E-i-C: The Internet Journal of Medical Education
- Prev by Date: RE: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Next by Date: RE: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Previous by thread: RE: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Next by thread: RE: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Index(es):