[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, pippa.smart@googlemail.com
- Subject: Re: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- From: Peter Suber <peters@earlham.edu>
- Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 00:25:51 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hi Pippa, On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Pippa Smart <pippa.smart@googlemail.com>wrote: One point that should be clarified - it is not publishers who > decide whether papers are accepted or refused, but editors. Most > publishers (at least those who operate ethically) do not > interfere with editorial decisions. Therefore at the moment they > are not in a position to legislate against accepting articles > from the "FRPAA agencies." > Some publishers have adopted general policies about compliance with funder mandates, binding on all their journals. Other publishers leave compliance decisions to individual journals. Here for example is the policy for the Nature Publishing Group journals, http://www.nature.com/authors/author_services/deposition.html Publishers are certainly able to decide --but generally have not decided--that their journals will not accept work by NIH-funded authors. I believe at the moment there is a "watching brief" but if > publishers start to believe that such mandates will cost them > sufficient money as to endanger their business, they may try to > ban papers from such authors - but if this happens there will be > a battle with the editors on the issue of editorial independence. > Yes, this might well happen. Peter - you mention some *profitable* OA publishers who do not > charge author fees. Can you provide some names (or point me to a > resource), so I can clarify where they obtain their income from. > Medknow is is a profitable OA journal publisher. All 108 of its OA journals are of the no-fee variety. http://www.medknow.com -- http://www.medknow.com/policies.asp Each Medknow journal has an OA edition and a priced print edition. Medknow generates its revenue from subscriptions to the print editions, advertising in the print and online editions, and (for some journals) association membership dues. When it added OA editions to its non-OA editions, it saw its submissions and subscriptions both increase. For details, see this 2008 account from D. K. Sahu, Medknow's publisher. (I haven't seen a more recent account.) http://openmed.nic.in/2911/ I believe that all the other profitable OA journal publishers charge publication fees. Best, Peter Peter Suber www.bit.ly/suber
- Prev by Date: Re: Ithaka S+R Faculty Survey 2009
- Next by Date: Re: Ithaka S+R Faculty Survey 2009
- Previous by thread: RE: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Next by thread: RE: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Index(es):