[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- From: "Susan Raidy-Klein" <susan.klein@simmons.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:47:29 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dennis, Are you able to obtain usage stats for publishers who do not provide those stats? If so, I would be interested in having you share the process with which you accomplish this. With thanks, Susan Susan Raidy-Klein Associate Director, Collection Services Simmons College Boston, MA 02115 susan.klein@simmons.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of dillon@mail.utexas.edu Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 6:03 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem) The Univ of Texas has been accessing e-books on a patron-driven pay-per-view model (along with with an automatic purchase of frequently used titles) for several years. Budgeting has been a snap. We have ebook usage data for our campus going back to the late 1990's and extrapolating this data (X number books in our profile set, with an expected usage rate of Y, with avg cost-per-use of Z equals - the budget). Buying books on spec in the traditional manner is simply too risky a behavior for our library to unthinkingly continue doing in this type of economy. We run performance numbers (circulations) for every publisher in both print and ebook formats, and then eliminate automatic purchasing plans for any high priced or low performing publishers - and move these low performers/high-priced publishers to strict title-by-title firm order purchasing, which is performed by subject specialists working within a firm budget. We are not going back to wholesale speculative book purchasing anytime soon - too many of our books purchased on spec are simply not read in the first few years, or ten years, or sometimes ever. We cannot afford these kinds of opportunity costs when there are other needs that our readers are clamoring for. Library purchasing of books requested via inter-library-loan, the loading of MARC records into OPACs and then paying for our users to instantly read the ebooks they are interested in, designing plans to let users' select print-on-demand, current paper imprints, or even out-of-print titles by interacting with the OPAC or other discovery tool- all of these kinds of efforts insure that every book we purchase or rent will find a reader. We believe that there is ample room in the market for fewer books to be purchased on speculation, and for more publisher revenue to be generated by usage-based pricing, patron-driven selection, and print-on-demand options. Moving to usage-based pricing and patron-driven selection means publishers and librarians have to rethink some paradigms and be more in tune with their readers, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. Dennis Dillon Associate Director for Research Services University of Texas Libraries, University of Texas at Austin
- Prev by Date: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Next by Date: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Previous by thread: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Next by thread: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Index(es):