[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- From: Heather Morrison <hgmorris@sfu.ca>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:45:44 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sandy Thatcher wrote: While not quite the same thing, do not some libraries, or university computer centers, limit the number of pages a student may print out per month or semester or year? I've heard that Brown University, among others, follows such a rationing practice. Is this "madness"? Comment: Rationing printing does make sense. There are hard costs associated with printing / photocopying; more important than budgetary concerns, however, is the environmental impact of excessive printing. Here, usage-based pricing serves a useful purpose. Rationing printing does not mean that reading is rationed. People can read online, read print books, etc. Eric Hellman wrote: As I said, the trick is to control the budget. Consider this variant. Suppose a library system put out a tender for ebook supply totalling 1 million dollars per year. Publishers participating in the tender would be paid a share of the $1M based on usage of the books they supplied. Please ignore for the moment the technical difficulties of measuring usage and consider whether such a system would provide the correct economic incentives. The publishers would have incentives to get their stuff used. The library would get a fixed expense. No one would have their usage rationed. I would also argue that many OA models are usage-based pricing, where the "price" is advertising exposure. Comment: If a library system can pool a million dollars a year for ebooks, why not provide local hosting and support for Open Monographs Press (coming soon), and subsidize the editorial work so that the books can be fully open access? If many library systems were to do this (or commit to what they can afford), then all end up with a substantial and ever-growing collection - and, importantly, without the DRM (digital rights management) that currently limits the usefulness of ebooks. best, Heather Morrison http://pages.cmns.sfu.ca/heather-morrison/
- Prev by Date: Re: Library Roles Changing, Open Access Not Compelling
- Next by Date: RE: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Previous by thread: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Next by thread: RE: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Index(es):