[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
UTK License Agreement & Liability Risk
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: UTK License Agreement & Liability Risk
- From: "Wayne, Rachel Sommer" <rwayne1@mail.tennessee.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:29:52 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
All, As a State Institution, The University of Tennessee must follow Tennessee State Law. These laws can be especially difficult when entering into contracts for electronic resources. In particular, Tennessee Law requires the following: 12-4-119. Limitations of liability and warranty in state contracting. (a) Agencies and departments of the executive branch of state government may allow limitations of liability and limitations of warranty in contracts for personal services, professional services, and consultant services according to the procedures for services contracting set forth in regulations promulgated by the commissioner of finance and administration in accordance with 12-4-109(a)(1)(A). (b) The limitations set forth in subsection (a) may not reduce the state's potential recovery from a contractor below two (2) times the value of the contract without the written permission of the commissioner of finance and administration. The commissioner shall promulgate rules and regulations in accordance with 12-4-109(a)(1)(A) describing the circumstances in which the limitations are permitted and the procedures for obtaining permission. (c) In no event shall a limitation of liability or warranty permitted by this section limit the liability of the contractor for intentional torts, criminal acts, or fraudulent conduct. (d) The purpose of this section is to limit the monetary damages recoverable by the state in a claim or legal action against its contractor. This section does not authorize any further limitation on the legal rights of the state, does not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity of the state, and does not authorize a cause of action against the state in any jurisdiction. [Acts 2000, ch. 722, 2; 2003, ch. 413, 2; 2007, ch. 169, 1.] The Library at UTK has been struggling with vendors to modify contracts to comply with the law stated above. In some instances a vendor will not change their license agreements. When this impasse occurs, the library is required to state why an agreement for the electronic resource would not pose a risk of liability for the University or the state. I am writing to you all to ask if anyone has had a similar experience. If so, can you please advise me on what you did? Additionally, if anyone has any suggestions as to how a library may answer this question of "risk" please let me know. I appreciate your help and consideration. Thank you, Rachel Wayne If you would prefer, please contact me personally at rwayne1@utk.edu. Licensing Specialist The University of Tennessee Library Knoxville, TN 37996-1000
- Prev by Date: Understanding Digital Natives: How does academic publishing need to change to serve tomorrow's scholars?
- Next by Date: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Previous by thread: Understanding Digital Natives: How does academic publishing need to change to serve tomorrow's scholars?
- Next by thread: Effective Journals Marketing, June, London
- Index(es):