[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gmail at Yale
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Gmail at Yale
- From: Mark Funk <mefunk@med.cornell.edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:45:19 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
As Joe said, many times good enough is all we need. Wired magazine had a story on the "good enough" revolution last August: http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/magazine/17-09/ff_goodenough The article even featured this part about publishing: > Speaking at an Online publishers conference in London last > October, New York University new-media studies professor Clay > Shirky had a mantra to offer the assembled producers and > editors: "Don't believe the myth of quality." When it comes to > the future of media on the Web, Shirky sternly warned, resist > the reflex to focus on high production values. "We're getting > to the point where the Internet can support high-quality > content, and it's as if what we've had so far has all been nice > - a kind of placeholder - but now the professionals are > coming," Shirky said. "That's not true." To reinforce his > point, he pointed to the MP3. The music industry initially > laughed off the format, he explained, because compared with the > CD it sounded terrible. What record labels and retailers failed > to recognize was that although MP3 provided relatively low > audio quality, it had a number of offsetting positive > qualities. Mark Funk On Apr 9, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Electronic Content Licensing Discussion wrote: > As someone who works with digital research publications said to > me recently, it is not sustainable to have 80% of the cost > deliver 20% of the value. In English: some features cost too > much. > > I think it is a very serious mistake to design (and pay for) a > system that has the most demanding users in mind. This results > in systems that are overbuilt and expensive to maintain. > While there clearly are exceptions, very often good enough is > good enough. > > Cloud computing is (mostly) good enough and getting better. > As it matures it will save institutions millions of dollars in > IT costs. Any my question is, Considering the cost of higher > education and the priorities of research universities, isn't > good enough good enough for email? > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Opportunities for Publishers Despite Challenging Economic Climate
- Next by Date: Beyond Copyright: Open Access as an Alternative Business Model
- Previous by thread: Re: Gmail at Yale
- Next by thread: Price Defects Research (it's a Wiley!)
- Index(es):